• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)

ARTICLES CALENDAR
April 2009
S M T W T F S
    May »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog

Archive of April 15th, 2009

The Bank of Canada and its April 21st options

Published on April 15th 2009

If the BOC understands that the situation in Canada does not yet warrant creating new money, we can see a further reduction in the Target for the Overnight Rate, which currently is 50bps. Another option would be to reduce assets. But the assets to dispose of would be government debt, and its respective yield would rise. This would push interest rates higher and increase the demand for/appreciate the Canadian dollar.

Good morning,

We are closer to the 21st of April, when market participants expect the Bank of Canada (BOC) to provide more definition on its future policy. In the past two days, I have observed that, along with the appreciation of the Canadian dollar, there is a lower expectation of an aggressive move by the BOC. The Canadian dollar has appreciated from 0.815 USD cents to 0.8222 cents, as I write. Personally, I see this trend more related to USD weakness than to Canadian dollar fundamentals.

For the BOC, Canadian dollars in circulation are a liability (and an asset for their holders). If the BOC decides that the situation in Canada is so weak that indeed warrants the creation of new money (i.e. an increase in liabilities), we need to see a matching increase in the assets of the BOC. What assets would increase? The BOC, in its annual report, shows two main categories of assets: a) Securities purchased under resale agreements and b) Investments, which are comprised of Treasury bills of Canada and Government of Canada bonds. The BOC could potentially use any combination of these. But I think it would make more sense to directly buy securities from those institutions in need of liquidity (category a, Advances to members of Canadian Payments Association account).

If the BOC understands that the situation in Canada does not yet warrant creating new money, we can see a further reduction in the Target for the Overnight Rate, which currently is 50bps. Another option would be to reduce assets. But the assets to dispose of would be government debt, and its respective yield would rise. This would push interest rates higher and increase the demand for/appreciate the Canadian dollar. Both consequences are counterproductive.

So far, this is a summarized description of a mechanism, that does not tell much by itself. More relevant, I think, is to understand the purpose behind the creation of new money, particularly in Canada. Canada’s ongoing crisis was imported. Canadian real estate prices did not trigger a negative wealth effect, as in the United States. The transmission mechanism was different, and originated as a slowdown in production, mainly related to exports. Canada did not have a “balance sheet” problem, but will have an “income” one (which can obviously later develop into a serious balance sheet problem). Under these circumstances, I think the only way to revert this situation is with either deflation, which is politically unacceptable, or an increase in productivity. Creating new money avoids deflation, of course, which denies us access to one of the solutions. Therefore, do we have to think that creating new money will increase productivity? Why is Canada considering monetary policy to solve a productivity problem?

The reason Canada could start using the monetary approach may be the pressure coming from other nations that seek a coordinated inflationary action to offset their own deflations. This coordinated debasement of the world’s most important currencies is currently associated with “globalization”. The reason Canada is not considering a fiscal approach may be the late political instability, given that the country has a minority Government.

My only hope is that on April 21st, I read news about a lower target for the overnight rate… If I don’t, I will know we are in trouble when I start seeing the credit default swap for Canada being quoted. As I said in previous comments, sovereign credit default swaps are used to hedge the ongoing transfer of risk from the private sector to the public sector. No such transfer has occurred yet in Canada (which is the reason I think Canada’s credit default swap is not demanded yet), but the creation of new money under the mechanism described above would bring about this transfer. With it, we would also see increasing weakness in the Canadian dollar…

On another note, I think that yesterday we saw a pause in the ongoing inflationary process (also known as bear market rally). With negative news on US retail sales and the continued heavy Treasurys ($7.3BN) purchases by the Fed, suddenly, Treasury Bay seemed a safer place to dock the ships. There is an increasing and understandable concern about the effectiveness of the Fed in decreasing interest rates with its purchases of Treasurys and,… there is also an increasing expectation that the Fed will announce an upsize of the $300BN purchase program, just as I have been speculating since the March 19th announcement. This could indicate that we are at the dawn of a “run” against the U.S. Treasury.

Finally, I think the markets have not paid enough attention to the news that Poland may obtain a $20.5BN line of credit from the IMF. This is positive (in the short term at least) news, given the horrible picture in Eastern Europe and Baltic nations, and the corresponding challenge to the Eurozone.

Twitt

116 Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang