• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Glossary
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Daily Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Beware of coordination
  • Did Friday mark the start of a new trend?
  • Was the home sales figure the catalyst?
  • Looking for the catalyst
  • More questions than answers

ARTICLES CALENDAR
May 2009
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009

Search this Blog

Archive of August 18th, 2010

Where do we go from here?

Published on May 5th 2009

We are seeing central banks anticipating problems. The Fed is keeping the status quo, and creditor countries are cooperating with the supply of USD assets, helped by non-disappointing fundamentals. Will the stress tests results disappoint? Disappointment is a function of expectations, and expectations are low on this issue. However, the market remains vigilant.

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: may-5-2009

Yesterday was a busy day. The S&P500 broke through the 900 pts (closed at 907pts) on reiteration of positive fundamentals coming from the real estate sector, in spite of numerous rumors on banks capital needs. Remember that the stress test results are released this Thursday. Month over month, Pending Home Sales were at 3.2% (up, from 2.1%), while Construction Spending was 0.3% (up from -0.9%, expected was -1.6%). Where do we go from here?
As I said before, I believe the market needs some indication of an exit strategy by the Fed. One way would be to say the announced Treasuries purchase plan is enough. No further purchases are needed. This was in the statement of the Federal Open Market Committee last week. In any Macroeconomics textbook, this is called a “once-and-for-all” monetary expansion. But for this to work, the market must believe in the intentions of the Fed. Do you think the market believes? I think the market is looking for fundamentals, economic data, not to disappoint. Because they would signal that there will be a demand for the increasing supply of money. Thus, mainstream economics teaches us that the price level would remain stable.  Therefore, if you agree with this approach, risk assets should keep being bid, as long as fundamentals don’t disappoint. Please, note that I am not saying that the market wants good fundamentals. I am saying the market wants fundamentals not to disappoint. I hope I am clear here.
Another way would be to find an alternative buyer of US govt. assets. I always thought that creditor countries (Asia) could assist on this front. If the Fed can’t protect the value of the USD, it is as useful to weaken other currencies against it. Yesterday, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, together with Japan, China and South Korea announced they will start a $120 billion foreign-currency reserve pool by year-end. Japan will contribute $38.4 bn to the pool, plus $60 bn of yen-denominated swap facilities separately. With a reserve fund, other central banks bid for assets the Fed is going to monetize. In this fashion, a further steepening of the benchmark curve is delayed, but not avoided. This pool is composed of bilateral currency swaps. I guess you have to smile here. A reserve fund for 13 nations that together have more than $3.6 trillions of currency reserves? This initiative by itself is bullish of the USD and USD denominated assets (because it weakens the yen), but the markets did not operate on it yesterday.

In conclusion, we are seeing central banks anticipating problems. The Fed is keeping the status quo, and creditor countries are cooperating with the supply of USD assets, helped by non-disappointing fundamentals. Will the stress tests results disappoint? Disappointment is a function of expectations, and expectations are low on this issue. However, the market remains vigilant. The chart below (source: Bloomberg) shows how Treasuries (30-yr active, in white) reacted on the different news yesterday. Stocks (orange) keep their trend, as in Newton’s First Law of Motion: Every body persists in its state of being at rest or of moving uniformly straight forward, except insofar as it is compelled to change its state by force impressed (Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, 1687).

may-5-2009

No Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang