• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)

ARTICLES CALENDAR
May 2009
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog

Archive of May 28th, 2009

The Fed is being challenged

Published on May 28th 2009

This is a spiraling situation. Remember Newton’s First Law of Motion: Every body persists in its state of being at rest or of moving uniformly straight forward, except insofar as it is compelled to change its state by force impressed (Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, 1687). Any object today, as soon as it is subject to an external force, spirals. The Fed impresses a force on Treasuries and their yield spirals, which triggered the spiral sale in mortgages, which triggers an increase in mortgage rates, which triggers a decrease in mortgage refinancing, which triggers a slow down in the housing market recovery, which triggers a sale of equities that need to reprice activity recovery assumptions, which triggers stop losses, which triggers FURTHER liquidity requirements, which triggers repatriation of USD….which requires a bigger intervention of the Fed, fuelling the spiral again…

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: may-28-2009

The Fed is being challenged. Let’s mince no words here.  The Fed yesterday bought a $6BN in May/12 to Aug/13 securities. By now, the Fed has reached $131BN of the scheduled $300BN. At close, all yields except at the front end were touching new highs and the curve continued to steepen. The S&P 500 closed at 893.06 (-1.90%), while credit was not so hurt: The CDX IG12 was only a bit wider at 147, even after GM bondholders rejected the Treasury’s plan to wipe their rights, leaving little options but an expected bankruptcy.

As we have endlessly discussed, I always believed in two things: 1) The Fed will have to size up its Treasury purchase program; 2) This is a spiraling situation (spiraling of what? Of everything! Remember Newton’s First Law of Motion: Every body persists in its state of being at rest or of moving uniformly straight forward, except insofar as it is compelled to change its state by force impressed (Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, 1687). Any object today, as soon as it is subject to an external force, spirals. The Fed impresses a force on Treasuries and their yield spirals, which triggered the spiral sale in mortgages, which triggers an increase in mortgage rates, which triggers a decrease in mortgage refinancing, which triggers a slow down in the housing market recovery, which triggers a sale of equities that need to reprice activity recovery assumptions, which triggers stop losses, which triggers FURTHER liquidity requirements, which triggers repatriation of USD….which requires a bigger intervention of the Fed, fuelling the spiral again…This is nothing new for us, since in this letter, we have been boringly and relentlessly repeating that the further the Fed will buy, the further the market will sell. We even called this Thesis No. 1! All of a sudden, this is news this week everywhere. Yet, there are analysts recommending long Treasury positions, and amazed at reality. Amazed at oil increasing to $63.14/barrel!
The yield curve steepened big time yesterday, with a lot of buying in the front-end by foreign central banks…Some friends asked me how this all affects us Canadians. When foreign central banks put these dubious US Treasury notes in the asset side of their balance sheets, they do so by increasing their liabilities (their own notes, the foreign country’s respective currency) at the same time. These irresponsible central banks are importing inflation to their respective countries. They are debasing the medium of exchange used by their countries’ citizens, the same citizens that on top of this fraud have to pay their taxes. This is the ruin of global savings. I know I sound bitter here, but the situation does warrant it. Now, back to the question: How is Canada affected? Positively. Why? By default! What do I mean? I mean that because Canada does NOT buy into this, does not hoard US notes, we….for now at least, keep saving ourselves and our kids’ future.
I attach below two charts. On the left side, we can see how once the 30-yr Treasury price fell to $95, the Canadian dollar lost vs. the USD. What happened? This price or support level was critical and when it was broken, it triggered a sell-off and a liquidity call: USD had to be purchased. Thus, the Canadian dollar did not respond to fundamentals here. On the right side, we can see that equities (S&P500 index) closely followed Treasuries. What was the link? The housing market. Two factors defined that link: The sell off in mortgages, which started a few days ago, and the news yesterday that the Mortgage Bankers Association’s weekly mortgage applications survey had fallen 14.2%.

may-28-20091

Twitt

126 Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang