• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • The Microeconomics of Inflation (or how I know this ends in tears)
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”

ARTICLES CALENDAR
August 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog

Archive of August 17th, 2009

Back to March levels?

Published on August 17th 2009

Can last week’s reversal lead us back to March/09 levels, if bad macro news keep coming and the Fed is really not going to monetize any more fiscal debt? I think this is only half of the problem. I think the other half is that the global coordination we saw in 2008 is loosing strength in 2009. The Bank of England led the way with its decision to increase its quantitative easing program. Others should follow, but are in denial mode. We should not ignore the VIX index, which is telling us correlation (systemic risk) is still alive.

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: august-17-2009

I thought it would be worthwhile to start the week describing how the last one ended. Today’s letter will be merely descriptive (vs. the typical analytical format) and full of charts, but I think that sometimes, there is value in induction.

With positive news out of Europe early Friday, it seemed it was going to be a good day across the Atlantic. The surprise came when, suddenly, the 30-yr Treasury rallied in early trading. With this rally, the yield curve was going to have an interesting flattening move by the end of the week (see charts below). However, early in the morning the USD was not appreciating, but the EUR/JPY was falling. Why would the USD not rally as well? Someone suggested it was a signal that the USD was becoming “the” carry currency, in line with what had happened to Japan. But if that was the case, we should have seen risk being bid (equities rising overseas, credit tightening), and that did not happen. In the meantime, crude (at around 8am ET) was holding its weight. One could still hope…until it just plunged. Obviously, volatility increased. Where is the inconsistency? As you can see, the 3-mo Libor-OIS spread kept making lower lows (did that liquidity end up in Treasuries?), while sovereign credit default swaps remain extremely cheap. Can this reversal lead us back to March/09 levels, if bad macro news keep coming and the Fed is really not going to monetize any more fiscal debt? I think this is only half of the problem. I think the other half is that the global coordination we saw in 2008 is loosing strength in 2009. The Bank of England led the way with its decision to increase its quantitative easing program. Others should follow, but are in denial mode. We should not ignore the VIX index, which is telling us correlation (systemic risk) is still alive.
(Source: Bloomberg)
aug-17-2009

Twitt

98 Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang