• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)

ARTICLES CALENDAR
September 2009
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog

Archive of September 3rd, 2009

Staying the course, II

Published on September 3rd 2009

The last 24 hours have been marked again by policy…In my view, the relevant action yesterday took place in Fixed Income, as stocks ended almost flat (chart 1 below, S&P500 intraday vs. 30-yr Treasury) and the CDX IG12 index closed at 125bps, (+3bps). I looked at my screens and could not understand why (as you see in the chart below, source: Bloomberg) Treasuries (long-end) rallied in the absence of a broad sell-off. This could not be a flight-to-safety trade, with the 3-mo Libor- OIS spread making a lower low, at 15.35bps.

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: september-3-2009

The last 24 hours have been marked again by policy. As we wrote yesterday, by now (after Geithner’s statement) the market has accepted the idea that interest rates may well remain untouched (at least in the most relevant currency areas). Two additional elements here: 1) in the dollars bloc (Australia, Canada and New Zealand), as the recession is milder, the easy money may have to be pulled out earlier than later, and 2) in emerging markets (debt-loaded emerging markets) there may be a need to keep monetizing stimulus packages, particularly if China slows down to more sustainable activity levels, but such over monetization would bring a run against their currencies. This last point is relevant. A run against an emerging market’s currency would not necessarily be supportive of the USD, if the same is triggered by a wave of defaults affecting the country’s financial system. It could potentially be supportive of gold, if the big guys (G-8 countries) don’t lend a timely hand.

Thus, prices continue to adjust to this new outlook, first drafted by “A View from the Trenches” on August 19th, , ahead of the curve. We therefore see the dollars not depreciating but trading in range, as risk assets correct (consequence of element #1 above) and we start to see an interesting arbitrage within emerging markets. Although money at this stage seems on aggregate to leave emerging markets, the fact is that there is a lot of differentiation. There is no better example than the cross Brazilian Real /Mexican Peso, to reflect this point. The same is evident in sovereign credit default swaps, which have already begun to communicate this view. I have more to say about this new paradigm of global monetary coordination and in the coming week, I will present a “bonus” research note on it, proposing an analytical method to the problem.

In my view, the relevant action yesterday took place in Fixed Income, as stocks ended almost flat (chart 1 below, S&P500 intraday vs. 30-yr Treasury) and the CDX IG12 index closed at 125bps, (+3bps). I looked at my screens and could not understand why (as you see in the chart below, source: Bloomberg) Treasuries (long-end) rallied in the absence of a broad sell-off. This could not be a flight-to-safety trade, with the 3-mo Libor- OIS spread (chart at the bottom, source: Bloomberg) making a lower low, at 15.35bps. So, here’s my two cents (and am open to feedback): Given the new outlook for low rates, a new refinancing wave in mortgages could be on the way, even more so if the constructive macro backdrop remains. Under this scenario, mortgage investors would need to unwind their previous duration hedges: They had sold Treasuries (long-term) and now need to buy them back. This could explain the flattening move yesterday. An interesting article from Morgan Stanley’s Janaki Rao “Convexity Update: The Rally Is Not the Pain Trade”, published yesterday in the afternoon doesn’t side with my view, which makes me think that maybe the sell off in Agencies by Central Banks in the last weeks and yesterday’s news on Capmark are actually the answer to this counter intuitive action. I am only following Occam’s razor principle here…

september-3-2009-i

september-3-2009-ii

Twitt

104 Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang