• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)

ARTICLES CALENDAR
September 2009
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog

Archive of September 9th, 2009

A thought on gold

Published on September 9th 2009

I don’t see the rally in gold as a reflection of risk appetite (asset inflation) and I don’t see gold strong enough to withstand a potential killing move by central banks.

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: september-9-2009

Gold has finally passed the $1,000/oz mark. I was a bit nervous on Tuesday morning, but by noon, I had the feeling that the day would end according to our main trend forecast. Let’s see…

The 3-mo Libor-OIS spread made a newer low, at 12.89bps as Libor is now at 30.19bps. Thus, going forward I don’t think liquidity will have the power to fuel the rally to new highs, as the law of marginal returns kicks in, but at least forms a formidable wall against any “rebellion”.

Do I think yesterday’s action was about risk seeking, away from the USD, as it so smelled in early trading? Not really. Here’s why: If you look at the chart below (Source: Bloomberg. For regular readers, this is now a classic chart at “A View from the Trenches”) the spread between 30-yr Treasury and S&P500 was erratic. It was only after 1pm, after the uneventful $5BN of Treasuries purchases by the Fed took place that the random movements began to fade, with an inverse relationship between equities and sovereign risk taking the driver’s seat. The Fed bought Treasuries maturing between May/16 and Aug/19 (total purchases so far are at $281BN = only $19BN left to complete the $300BN program!!!). After 3pm, with the announcement of the record drop (by $21.6BN) in U.S. consumer credit, equities corrected but managed to close higher (S&P500 up 0.88%, at 1025.39). Corporate credit gives us another flag: The IG and HY indexes have been in range-bound trading since mid August, and yesterday’s action only confirmed this characteristic. Therefore, am I surprised that gold broke the $1,000/oz? No. Do I think it is the start of a new phase for gold? I will answer this from the other side of the coin. I read yesterday two asset allocation reports based on macro outlook reports. They were both bullish on equities. Regardless of the side they take, I think the approach is mistaken. Macro stats should support nothing these days.
It is all about deleveraging/leveraging forces, which tells me that central banks still hold too much power and makes me fear being a gold bug. For example, with yesterday morning’s move in gold, the Canadian dollar had made it to 1.0674 CAD/USD, only to go back to the 1.08+ CAD/USD. Why? The Bank of Canada intervened the market again, buying C$1BN of securities in a 272-day repurchase agreement, announced at 10:30am.
In conclusion, I don’t see the rally in gold as a reflection of risk appetite (asset inflation) and I don’t see gold strong enough to withstand a potential killing move by central banks.

Last but not least, I noticed that after the announcement of the fall in U.S. consumer credit, the CAD regained strength. A few days ago, such news would have triggered a flight-to-safety and USD-supportive trade. Yesterday, the market reacted different, confining the bad news to the US market. This was news to me…
september-9-2009

Twitt

109 Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang