• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)

ARTICLES CALENDAR
October 2009
S M T W T F S
« Sep   Nov »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog
« On central bank rethoric
On stocks as an inflation hedge »


Published on October 29th 2009

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: october-29-2009 Yes, we are experiencing a correction. No news here. Yesterday too, the Norges Bank raised its benchmark rate by 25bps, signaling the beginning of the end in accommodative policies. From wherever one sees the markets, profit taking is at the order of the day. [...]

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: october-29-2009

Yes, we are experiencing a correction. No news here. Yesterday too, the Norges Bank raised its benchmark rate by 25bps, signaling the beginning of the end in accommodative policies.
From wherever one sees the markets, profit taking is at the order of the day. The minimal hint that the recovery process will take longer than expected launches a new selling wave in risky assets and strengthens the USD. Has anything material occurred during the last week? No. Has the outlook on the recovery (slow) materially changed? No. Has the Fed signaled that they are willing to err on the side of caution and increase rates early? No. Has liquidity become more expensive (3-mo Libor – OIS spread)? No. Have emerging markets engaged in dangerous accommodative policies? No. Do we have political tensions in the world? The answer again is “No”!

What then is driving the correction? The law of marginal returns, mixed with constant risks. At the levels we had reached in equities and credit, the risks outweighed the feasible short-term marginal returns. And there is really not much more one can add here. Will central banks find it harder to quit the monetary easing under a correction? Yes, they will. Will governments see in the general weakness an excuse to remain under deficit? Yes, they will.
Can a correction spiral into a more serious sell off? With the information at hand, it is very difficult to see this happening. Something more material should be here, interrupting the liquidity normalization process. Could it be the idiocy of asking banks to be better capitalized? When the 2001 crisis unfolded in Argentina, banks had fractionary reserves of the order of 30% of assets, and of course, that was not enough.
In general, if this correction continues, it may present us with an opportunity to step in. For now, the general economic backdrop remains constructive in my view, and although the new home sales figures or oil inventories disappointed today, I see these issues anecdotic and it would be naïve to expect a recovery process to go unidirectional, from the lower left to the upper right.
Lastly, I thought I would quote here a paragraph found on Chapter XXXI “Currency and Credit manipulation”, of Ludwig Von Mises’ “Human Action”, published in 1949 (can be found at http://mises.org/humanaction/chap31sec5.asp ). These comments remain sooo relevant…:

“…The idea which generated what is called qualitative credit control [p. 796] is to channel the additional credit in such a way as to concentrate the alleged blessings of credit expansion upon certain groups and to withhold them from other groups. The credits should not go to the stock exchange, it is argued, and should not make stock prices soar. They should rather benefit the “legitimate productive activity” of the processing industries, of mining, of “legitimate commerce,” and, first of all, of farming. Other advocates of qualitative credit control want to prevent the additional credits from being used for investment in fixed capital and thus immobilized. They are to be used, instead, for the production of liquid goods. According to these plans, the authorities give the banks concrete directions concerning the types of loans they should grant or are forbidden to grant.

However, all such schemes are vain. Discrimination in lending is no substitute for checks placed on credit expansion, the only means that could really prevent a rise in stock exchange quotations and an expansion of investment in fixed capital. The mode in which the additional amount of credit finds its way into the loan market is only of secondary importance. What matters is that there is an inflow of newly created credit. If the banks grand more credits to the farmers, the farmers are in a position to repay loans received from other sources and to pay cash for their purchases. If they grant more credits to business as circulating capital, they free funds, which were previously tied up for this use. In any case, they create an abundance of disposable money for which its owners try to find the most profitable investment. Very promptly, these funds find outlets in the stock exchange or in fixed investment. The notion that it is possible to pursue a credit expansion without making stock prices rise and fixed investment expand is absurd…”

Twitt

« On central bank rethoric
On stocks as an inflation hedge »

3 Comments for “”

  1. hua hin guest houses dice:
    February 10th, 2012 at 8:07 PM

    Blogs ou should be reading…

    [...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……

  2. Real Estate Investment Software dice:
    February 15th, 2012 at 6:55 PM

    Tough Week…

    It was a tough week here this week, so I just took to messing around online and realized…

  3. sex am telefon dice:
    February 15th, 2012 at 11:24 PM

    You should check this out…

    [...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]……

Leave a comment





nine × = 18

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang