• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Glossary
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Daily Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • An analytic framework for 2012
  • There is no decoupling
  • Recap of 2011 and thoughts for 2012
  • The Fed already started QE3, but in the Eurozone
  • The detail nobody talks about

ARTICLES CALENDAR
November 2009
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009

Search this Blog

Archive of December 5th, 2011

Don’t blame crude oil!

Published on November 13th 2009

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: november-13-2009
After the close of yesterday’s session, commentators attributed the drop in equities (S&P500 closed at 1087.24 or -1.03%) to the Crude Inventory Report. Indeed, it was after the release of the report at 10:30am, that the sell-off was triggered. However, if the move had to [...]

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: november-13-2009

After the close of yesterday’s session, commentators attributed the drop in equities (S&P500 closed at 1087.24 or -1.03%) to the Crude Inventory Report. Indeed, it was after the release of the report at 10:30am, that the sell-off was triggered. However, if the move had to come from that corner, we should have seen a better bid for the Treasuries auction at 1pm. The Treasury auctioned $16BN in 30-yrs. The auction was a bit soft vs. others in the past months, and awarded at 4.469% or at 2bps higher.

Thus, yesterday, even though the session started with the jobs data release coming better than expected (Initial jobless claims at 502,000 vs. 510,000 expected and 512,000 prior week), the market had made up its mind. Would it take profits and seek refuge in Treasury Bay? Not in my view. The market only wanted to money. The market preferred the USD, in my view.

My interpretation is in disagreement with the consensus view. The consensus view is that yesterday, as the USD strengthened, commodities had to sell off, which weakened energy stocks, dragging everything else. To me that was the symptom. My question to you is: Why did the USD strengthen? The answer to this question will be the real explanation. I am including below a chart of the Dollar Index (DXY). As you can see, the trend upwards was very solid all day long. Weakness after the jobs data release was bought. Strength after the Crude Inventory Report was not sold.

I will try now to explain why, in my view, the USD strengthened:

Since October, the yield curve has steepened. The Fed has finished its $300BN Treasury Purchase Program and the market is wondering who’s going to finance the obscene 2010 deficit + refinancings, next year. Recent data shows that it may not be foreign institutional accounts. Furthermore, the Treasury has announced its intention to increase the average maturity of its debt. In summary, while the US government insists in keeping or even increasing the current stimulus programs, the Fed is honoring its word that although it will not raise rates, it will not accommodate fiscal budgets either. The financial situation at the municipal level has not improved and consumer weakness is still out there. This is enough to understand that a steeper yield curve is very feasible, hurting credit, stocks and Treasuries, and strengthening the USD, ceteris paribus.

May this mean that we are set for some range-bound trading? What will decide a future gap higher or lower in risky assets? On the fiscal side, the situation looks very solid in favor of stable deficits. Therefore, what is the missing piece here? I suggest it is the actions other central banks may take.

november-12-2009

205 Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang