• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)

ARTICLES CALENDAR
November 2009
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog
« Some thoughts on Dubai
Liquidity still rules »

A chart is worth a thousand words

Published on November 30th 2009

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: november-30-20091 Today’s letter is very brief and is the continuation of Friday’s, which at the same time, constitutes another good test of our Thesis No. 2 on gold, postulated on April 21st, 2009. Why is today’s letter so short? Because it has an attached chart [...]

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: november-30-20091

Today’s letter is very brief and is the continuation of Friday’s, which at the same time, constitutes another good test of our Thesis No. 2 on gold, postulated on April 21st, 2009. Why is today’s letter so short? Because it has an attached chart that I think is worth more than a thousand words.  As we wrote on Friday, Dubai’s crisis is starting to look contained, delimited and unique by its political background. Of course, given the impact on financial institutions locally and in Europe mostly, one cannot ignore it. But, as we wrote too, according to our thesis, if central banks step in to coordinate action against potential contagion in the foreign exchange markets, gold loses its chances to become a reserve asset.
Thus, on Thursday night, the news that the Bank of Japan was considering intervention (according to some analysts it did not carry it fully out, to avoid adding confusion to the situation in Dubai), as the chart below shows, brought gold to its knees overnight, after it had held admirably well on Thursday. Also shown (at the bottom of chart), is the 3-month Libor – Overnight Index Swap spread, which a benchmark of the liquidity conditions in the USD market. On Friday, this spread opened almost unchanged. Thus, in Europe equity markets ended up correcting Thursday’s sell off and even as the S&P500 Index was down to 1,083 intraday, the VIX Index managed to contract intraday, closing at 24.74 or 5+% higher than Monday’s open. What is the conclusion? Well, I hope it will be obvious by now how much control central banks retain yet…

Martin Sibileau


november-30-2009

Twitt

« Some thoughts on Dubai
Liquidity still rules »

Leave a comment





× two = 6

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang