• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Glossary
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Daily Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • An analytic framework for 2012
  • There is no decoupling
  • Recap of 2011 and thoughts for 2012
  • The Fed already started QE3, but in the Eurozone
  • The detail nobody talks about

ARTICLES CALENDAR
December 2009
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009

Search this Blog

Archive of December 5th, 2011

Days of Confusion

Published on December 8th 2009

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: december-8-2009
We closed tighter in credit yesterday, with the IG13 index (tracks the credit spread of 125 North American investment grade firms) losing about 2 ¼ bps intraday. It seems that credit is “getting it”, while equities and commodities are struggling.
What is credit getting? That liquidity [...]

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: december-8-2009

We closed tighter in credit yesterday, with the IG13 index (tracks the credit spread of 125 North American investment grade firms) losing about 2 ¼ bps intraday. It seems that credit is “getting it”, while equities and commodities are struggling.

What is credit getting? That liquidity is available and will be available for a long time. But, to be fair, the relationship between credit spreads and liquidity is very straightforward, very simple. It is certainly not that simple with equities and commodities, because inflation is a non-neutral monetary process, where the prices of assets do not change simultaneously (i.e. not simultaneously, as the mainstream theory states).

However, the world is worried about a potential sudden decrease in liquidity. On this front, I am only concerned about the situation in Europe. In the sovereign risk market, players in the Euro zone are starting to distinguish between the strong countries and “peripherals”. I really do not know whether there are in fact any strong countries, to begin with. Nevertheless, let’s accept the distinction… Greece is of course a peripheral, together with Portugal, which yesterday morning was put on negative watch, for downgrade, by S&P. It is not clear yet what would happen, should any of these “peripherals”, which include Italy, engage in an upward deficit spiral. I doubt we would get to that point because these countries would neither leave the Euro zone to practice a debasement of their own currencies nor would the European Central Bank deny liquidity lines for their respective deficits. Therefore, the Euro loses ground, and this is more evident when one sees the cross with the Canadian dollar: In the last two sessions, the Euro has lost 3 cents against the CAD.

Thus, while we are led to believe that Europe practices some sort of restraint, the opposite is certainly taking place in the export countries of Asia, awash with liquidity that looks for yield. As you can see, in perspective, the slow but certain debt deflation (or inflation) is taking place worldwide. Should we believe then the market, when it implicitly expects things to get tougher?
The US yield curve has steepened significantly since the end of November, but Fed’s Bernanke repeated yesterday, in a speech to the Economic Club of Washington, that “…interest rates are likely to remain low for an extended period”, and that “the U.S. economy faces formidable headwinds, including a weak labor market and tight credit that are likely to produce a moderate pace of expansion…” I agree on the diagnosis, but disagree on the medicine. However, I am more inclined to believe Mr. Bernanke than those who didn’t believe him and let gold drop to below $1,150/oz.

These are times of confusion and I will wait until January to make a strategic allocation of my capital, when I have more clarity and less end-of-year noise.

Martin Sibileau

197 Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang