• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • The Microeconomics of Inflation (or how I know this ends in tears)
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”

ARTICLES CALENDAR
December 2009
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog
« Thinking with perspective
Liquidity, liquidity and more liquidity »

Thinking about 2010

Published on December 11th 2009

“…And when output has increased and prices have risen, the effect of this on liquidity-preference will be to increase the quantity of money necessary to maintain a given rate of interest…” (J. M. Keynes, “The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money”, Chapter 13, Section III, 1936).

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: december-11-2009

It seems that in the last 24 hrs, the world has put the ongoing confusion in perspective, and become a bit more optimistic on the outlook for 2010. At “A View from the Trenches”, we remain optimistic.  Too many times, we have written that liquidity remains intact and that as long liquidity is not affected, the rally will continue.

Now, although liquidity is out there, the underlying force behind it, fiscal deficits, is also alive. From the research that I read and comments that I heard in the last days, I feel analysts are underestimating this issue. There is a widespread expectation that volatility in 2010 will be more muted. But if the growing trend in fiscal deficits is to be broken, something of consequence needs to happen. And when something of consequence happens, expectations must be reassessed, which hardly represents a picture of muted volatility. Thus, for me to remain bullish entering 2010, I need to see that the fiscal gap is manageable, that it is not a problem, because if it is, things are going to spiral out of control and rather swiftly.

All one can ask for is consistency, and so far, we have not seen it. Next year will give us an environment with a US Treasury issuing more debt (and with longer average duration), with a still unsolved demand for Agency debt (once the Fed stops its bid in Apr/10), with the Euro zone falling into pieces, and with creditor countries in Asia exacerbating the USD peg. This is barely a picture of muted volatility and higher valuations…

I am confident we will see effective policy action on all of these fronts. But, muted volatility? I don’t think so. I am also confident that there will be further monetary coordination in 2010, and consequently, I believe gold could underperform, according to our Thesis No.2. On this basis, in 2010 I am tempted to slowly shift my investments to USD denominated assets and give equities a chance (I see credit/fixed income a bit rich vs. equities).

Below, I show a chart (source: Bloomberg) with the US Treasuries (Active) yield curve. You can see the steepening move since the beginning of December. Please, do not ignore it. It will be a move of consequence.

Martin Sibileau

december-11-2009

Twitt

« Thinking with perspective
Liquidity, liquidity and more liquidity »

3 Comments for “Thinking about 2010”

  1. Sex Cams dice:
    February 16th, 2012 at 1:01 AM

    Recent Blogroll Additions……

    [...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……

  2. telefonsex dice:
    February 16th, 2012 at 1:25 AM

    Blogs ou should be reading…

    [...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……

  3. ICM Document Solutions dice:
    February 16th, 2012 at 2:17 AM

    Tumblr article…

    I saw a writer writing about this on Tumblr and it linked to…

Leave a comment





− 1 = six

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang