• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)

ARTICLES CALENDAR
December 2009
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog

Archive of December 22nd, 2009

Reviewing the process

Published on December 22nd 2009

“…And when output has increased and prices have risen, the effect of this on liquidity-preference will be to increase the quantity of money necessary to maintain a given rate of interest…” (J. M. Keynes, “The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money”, Chapter 13, Section III, 1936).

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: december-22-2009

Before we go on to discuss the latest development, I invite you to refer back to my letter from May 26th, 2009 (www.sibileau.com/martin/2009/05/26 , “A short description of the process”). In that letter, I laid out the main drivers of the adjustment process, after the monetary expansion. Given the market action in December, I think it is worth reviewing these comments.

Apart from the international coordination in monetary policies and globalization of production chains, there really isn’t anything new that a good macroeconomics book will not tell you. We witnessed a full transfer of private deficits to the balance sheet of governments. On top of that, governments were already running their own deficits and now, with the assumption of liabilities from the private sector and the fall in revenue, they will have to either reduce spending or increase taxes. And they will of course increase taxes. They will tax us to death: They will tax more of your income flows, they will tax your savings flows and your wealth no matter where you store it. And should citizens of the world decide to store it in gold….they will see it confiscated by their governments. The sooner this happens, the faster we will be better off. It is like a vomit… you feel much better after it and there is no point in delaying it.

In the meantime, the government that is best equipped to handle its deficits is of course the US government, because of the international reserve status of its liabilities, in which its debt is also denominated. The market is now discriminating sovereign risk and sees the US as the lesser of all evils. It buys USD accordingly not because it loves USD, but because it hates Euros and gold, the two alternatives.

The cycle where US yields are to rise within a steepening move kicked off, and in full force. Some analysts disagree with me, and believe that the fall we witnessed yesterday in the 30-yr Treasury (dropping to 96+ from 99) is explained by the illiquidity proper to this short week. It is true, volume in Treasuries yesterday was below average (73%) but you would have to be naive to miss the trend triggered since the end of November. As well, in corporate credit, we saw the CDX IG13 Index (tracks the credit default swaps of a pool of 125 liquid North American investment grade companies) compress to 85.5bps, from the 90+ we had only a week ago.

Within a steady low-interest-rate environment and ongoing quantitative easing policies, higher sovereign yields and lower corporate credit spreads will be positive of USD equities and negative for gold. As you can see below (Source: Bloomberg), I have included today two charts. To the left, we have crude oil, in 2008, when it began to fall until it reached $32/bbl. To the right, we have gold, in USD/oz. The two charts look very similar and give me horribly ominous feeling on gold.

december-22-2009

Martin Sibileau

Twitt

154 Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang