• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)
  • Gold manipulation: The logical outcome of mainstream Economics

ARTICLES CALENDAR
January 2010
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog

Archive of January 5th, 2010

Archimedes’ principle revisited

Published on January 5th 2010

When you overflow a bucket with water, if it spills over to a next one underneath, Archimedes’ principle says that a body immersed in the bucket underneath will be buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the displaced fluid. Think of the buckets as markets and the fluids as liquidity…

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: january-5-2009

The year started with a very straightforward session of USD weakness. To me, the trade was very simple. At 10am yesterday, with the release of the macro data of the day (ISM Manufacturing Index at 55.9 vs. 54.3 expected and 53.6 prior; ISM Prices Paid at 61.5 vs. 57.2 expected and 55.0 prior), the market received confirmation that credit expansionary policies are elbowing their way through the markets.

When you overflow a bucket with water, if it spills over to a next one underneath, Archimedes’ principle says that a body immersed in the bucket underneath will be buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the displaced fluid. Think of the buckets as markets and the fluids as liquidity… However, what happens if the overflow is not a one-time event but a constant stream of liquidity? This is what the markets thought yesterday. If the macro data would have been the confirmation of only a one-time event, I don’t think we would be seeing the steepening of the US yield curve shown in the chart below (Source: Bloomberg), since the beginning of last December.

Indeed, investors seem to disagree with the notion that the credit expansion was a 2009 event only. Until proven wrong, the credit expansion should continue in 2010. To this point, on yesterday’s letter, I briefly mentioned my concern over the US Treasury’s announcement on GSE (Government-sponsored enterprises) debt. Briefly, the Treasury made it clear that it will stay behind (i.e. inject capital in the form of preferred stock) the GSEs (i.e. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac) should their net worth deteriorate in 2010, as delinquent loans (mortgages) increase and these Agencies buy these out. (Why? Precisely, because delinquent loans are expected to increase!)

In order to carry out these buyouts, Agencies need not only to be capitalized, but also to borrow to fund the purchases. This is why investors may be right, if they think the current overflow will not be a one-time event. While market participants expect the US Treasury to keep issuing more debt with longer average duration, it is now more evident that Agency paper will also be in supply. Thus, the USD weakened and oil, gold, equities and credit rallied. Sometimes, it is best to leave things as simple as that. (Feedback here is welcome = If you don’t think that was the catalyst for USD weakness yesterday, please, share your views on what other factors might be behind this. Also, please, note that my view disagrees with the mainstream one that attributes the rally in equities to the release of bullish economic data out of China. If this was the case, higher rates should have been expected, lifting rather than weakening the USD, and keeping equities in check, but not rallying).

jan-05-2010

Martin Sibileau.

Twitt

3 Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang