• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)

ARTICLES CALENDAR
February 2010
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog

Archive of February 4th, 2010

Liquidity preference on the rise

Published on February 4th 2010

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: february-4-2010 In the previous letter, I framed my review of 2010 in three stages. The bottom line is that I am bearish, and expect the bearishness to progress. The progress will be marked by the lack of credit expansion, caused by central banks unwinding quantitative [...]

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: february-4-2010

In the previous letter, I framed my review of 2010 in three stages. The bottom line is that I am bearish, and expect the bearishness to progress. The progress will be marked by the lack of credit expansion, caused by central banks unwinding quantitative easing policies or by governments limiting the credit expansion, through regulation. Without this lifeline, the onus is on fundamentals. So far, they don’t seem to surprise nor disappoint. I think there is merit in my intuition, proved perhaps by the fact that both the Reserve Bank of Australia and the Norges Bank took a break from rising policy rates this week.

In this context of stagnation, monetary authorities will be increasingly pressed to leave the status quo unchanged. However, in the case of Europe , the situation may be different. As the fiscal situation deteriorates seemingly faster than previously thought, the European Central Bank will have to take an holistic approach to the problem. As I mentioned on December 17th (www.sibileau.com/martin/2009/12/17), I expect the path of least resistance to be the abuse of the private placement market (bank debt) to finance peripherals’ deficits (i.e. Greece , Portugal , Spain , Italy , Ireland ). This will guarantee that the European Central Bank will be forced to extend liquidity to the affected financial institutions, providing a hidden subsidy. This is clearly bearish of the Euro. The chart below is very ominous in this respect. It shows the IBEX (Spain) stock index, which is approx. 11% off its January peak (Source: Bloomberg). Yesterday, the weakness was noticeable, driven by financials (bank stocks). This is the worst kind of weakness you can see and a bull market will never rise from it.

Yesterday, the markets surprised me. Stocks and fixed income sold off, while credit remained flat. Credit, it is true, is undergoing a lot of technicals, which make the picture blurry. However, on average, the market sought liquidity, for the sake of liquidity given the steepening of the US yield curve (2y10y by 3.8 bps, to 282.2 bps). The USD strengthened, while I believe the strength in oil was merely a bounce within a bearish trend. If I am correct, not even the upcoming G7 meeting (where neither China , India or Russia will be present) will be able to coordinate the required global exit strategy. On this basis, I see an increasingly bigger role for gold as a reserve asset (not currency). But we will still have to see a lot more water running under the bridge, before gold shows us the way. All along, the social backdrop will grow uglier, as unemployment will remain high.

How to trade with this outlook? Keep it liquid, and keep it simple, when you short the stock market or play the curve in European sovereign credit. As I previously said, I don’t see volatility waning in 2010, given the global fiscal front, which means that complex trades can get killed by tail risk, courtesy of liquidity preference behavior.

Martin Sibileau

feb-4-2010

Twitt

89 Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang