• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)

ARTICLES CALENDAR
April 2010
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog

Archive of April 29th, 2010

The tip of the iceberg

Published on April 29th 2010

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: april-29-2010 What a week! It’s amazing how a few days make a difference these days. We will force ourselves to summarize into a few main points our views: In our previous letter, we wrote: “The ECB has its hands tied and hikes in policy rates [...]

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: april-29-2010

What a week! It’s amazing how a few days make a difference these days. We will force ourselves to summarize into a few main points our views:

In our previous letter, we wrote: “The ECB has its hands tied and hikes in policy rates cannot happen any time soon. The Euro will continue to be tossed off the proverbial cliff. But the question here is: What will the Euro fall more against, in relative terms? The USD? The CAD? Gold?

In our view, speed here is of the essence. If the Euro devaluation is not carried out in order, global liquidity will be affected. If it is orderly carried out, then the quiet and underlying shift of other central banks’ reserves (i.e. Russia , China ) out of the Euro and into the CAD, the AUD or gold will be more relevant, in relative terms. Hence, it is critical to understand what can cause a “disorderly” devaluation of the Euro and what its corresponding likelihood is. We think that anything that hints towards the dissolution of the monetary union, institutionally, will generate confusion and disorder. Under this scenario, Euros, gold, CAD, AUD and commodities will be sold, while USD and US Treasuries will be bought. Anything else that hints towards a slow and steady debasement of the Euro, will favor gold, CAD, AUD and commodities, at the expense of USD and US Treasuries demand…”

And now, post Greece/Portugal/Spain downgrades, we realize we were half right, or half wrong. The downgrades put the Union in a really tough spot. Commodities, stocks were sold and the USD strengthened. But gold….gold rallied. What happened?

In general, money serves three main purposes: It’s a unit of account, a medium of indirect exchange and a reserve asset. These uses are deeply interconnected. The demand for money is therefore usually conceived as the sum of the demand for liquidity purposes and for saving purposes: Md = Ld + Sd.

What we saw on Tuesday is proof to us that Md (=demand for money) is now STARTING TO BE (the operative word here is “Starting”) at a global level: Md = L (in USD) + S (in Gold). That is, the world may now be starting to use USD for liquidity/funding purposes and gold as a reserve asset. “Starting” again is the operative word. Some people may call this Gresham ‘s law. Gresham ‘s law would be currently at work on the Euro. People toss the Euro for USD and whatever else that is not needed for liquidity, is exchanged for gold.

Since Tuesday, it is evident to us that Europe has only two choices: Either Germany/France guarantee Greece’s debt (and soon Portugal’s) or the European Central Bank lifts the veil and accepts junk sovereign debt as collateral to fund PIGS banks. Which one do you think is politically easier to implement? In our view, it is the latter, which means the Euro will be devalued big time.

Until Tuesday, we considered gold as just another asset. Now, we’ve changed our view, which forces us to pay attention to this detail: Every time a risk position is unwound and a certain percentage is recycled back to USD for liquidity purposes, while another percentage goes to gold, we think that the capital that moves to gold is capital OUT of the system. Who will fill the gap? Will the ECB (i.e. central banks) fill the gap? Has that gap to be filled anyway? Why?

When a central bank tries to fill the gap, we have low inflation morphing into dynamic inflation which, if allowed to blossom, later becomes hyperinflation. At that point, and perhaps we are closer to that point than many of us want to believe, gold becomes “THE” reserve asset. What has to happen for this to materialize? It has to be a global shift in nature. Contagion out of Europe has to spread, it is a necessary condition, in our view.

Under such scenario, would commodities drop in price because Europeans wouldn’t be able to afford them? This is the key question for us in Canada and we think the answer is positive. Therefore, perhaps and only perhaps, we will not see any exit strategies after all. How do we position against this scenario? We want to start buying weakness in gold.

Martin Sibileau

Twitt

1 Comment »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang