• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)
  • Gold manipulation: The logical outcome of mainstream Economics

ARTICLES CALENDAR
September 2010
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog

Archive of September 28th, 2010

The onus is on Canada

Published on September 28th 2010

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: september-28-2010 We spent a lot of time going through FX intervention mechanisms in the last two letters, and did not have the time to write about what is obviously moving markets lately: The Fed’s decision to bring inflation to a level consistent with their target [...]

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: september-28-2010
We spent a lot of time going through FX intervention mechanisms in the last two letters, and did not have the time to write about what is obviously moving markets lately: The Fed’s decision to bring inflation to a level consistent with their target employment level and the ongoing fiscal crisis in Ireland  (the sovereign credit default swap widened from 200bps, the low in July to 500bps last week). Honestly, there is not much more we can add here and we won’t, except that we are surprised by the strength of the Euro and not only vs. the US dollar, but the Canadian dollar as well.

If we had to give a quick answer to this recent appreciation, we will point to actual weakness in the US dollar, post FOMC communiqué on September 21st, rather than intrinsic strength on the part of the European Monetary Union. As we wrote before, many analysts suggest the Euro should be strong because of the access the distressed members have to the European Financial Stability Facility. However, we think the opposite is true. If these countries ever need to access that facility, the whole monetary union will be in crisis, as a race will start among peripherals to use it before it’s gone and Germany feels the real pain of honoring their guarantee to contribute funding, perhaps even alone. Yes, we think there is a chance that the approval the parliaments of the respective union members gave, might be denounced by some countries.

But today, perhaps we should bring collective attention to the Euro in relation to the Canadian dollar. Since the communiqué by the Fed, the Canadian dollar has been underperforming. It is as if suddenly, Canada’s relative fiscal and financial situation were irrelevant. Gold has made new records and yet Canadian mining stocks are not (for instance, check gold vs. iShares S&P TSX Global Gold Index Fund, ticker: XGD.TO). Oil is showing strength, but the energy sector represented in the TSX is not (for instance, check crude oil vs. iShares S&P TSX Capped Energy Index Fund, ticker: XEG.TO).

There is increasing concern about the highly leveraged balance sheet of the average Canadian citizen and about the real estate market, particularly in the condo sector. The Bank of Canada is on a difficult position: If it raises its policy rate, to bring it to a more “neutral” level, it will face political pressure from the “export” lobby and the left, which of course sees the Bank as part of the official party. If it leaves it unchanged, the Canadian dollar will depreciate and inflation will be accelerated.

If Canadians don’t want to see their purchasing power fall, the world will need to see evidence that something new is coming up: Lower taxes or privatizations or spending cuts (By the way, this also applies to any society). It doesn’t matter which one or what combination thereof. Otherwise, in the absence of nice surprises, the trend will be for the Canadian dollar to fall on weakness and to underperform on strength. We don’t often write about Canada but when we did, we said that “…Canadian stocks are rising because foreign money is flowing in! And for foreign money to keep flowing in, Canada must show it can provide a stable currency. The world is starving for stability! All Canada needs to do is to remain quiet, while the rest of the world misbehaves and voices its anti capitalistic rhetoric…” (refer: “Meanwhile in Canada”, June 2nd, 2009: www.sibileau.com/martin/2009/06/02 and “The stars favor Canada”, March 4th, 2010: www.sibileau.com/martin/2010/03/04 )

September 21st marked the end of the good times for Canada. Canada is now linked to the fate of the US sovereign crisis. Stability is no longer enough. It can be found in gold, by those who seek a reserve asset, or in emerging markets, by those who look to profit from growth. The onus is on Canada to show the world that it can also outperform.

Martin Sibileau

Twitt

No Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang