• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)

ARTICLES CALENDAR
February 2011
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog

Archive of February 2nd, 2011

Mid-week comments

Published on February 2nd 2011

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: february-2-2011 Some quick comments for the mid-week, following up on our thesis that should the EFSF be used to purchase outstanding sovereign peripheral debt, the Euro would strengthen and possibly steal market share to gold within the reserve currency market. To begin with, in the [...]

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: february-2-2011

Some quick comments for the mid-week, following up on our thesis that should the EFSF be used to purchase outstanding sovereign peripheral debt, the Euro would strengthen and possibly steal market share to gold within the reserve currency market.

To begin with, in the past 48hrs, this scenario has been gaining weight with the consensus expecting a resolution on this in March. The common sense question, a question we’ve been approached by readers is whether the scenario is already priced in. We think there is still room for this view to crystallize, taking the Euro over the $1.40 level and bank credit spreads materially tighter. The obvious risk here is that the banking sector may not heal if Euro politicians overshoot on their wish to effectively convert banks’ senior bondholders into contributors contingent capital. But…how can they not overshoot? The mere suggestion of this folly is enough to hurt. The other risk is that a stronger Euro and continuous fiscal cost-cutting affect aggregate demand, questioning the sustainability of the status quo (= the avoidance of a restructuring). But we want to leave you with this: Regardless of what takes place, the ECB is by far way more capable of handling this mess than the Fed is, simply because the European Central Bank has not used any ammunition yet. Until now, they have been sterilizing their purchases of sovereign debt. Remember, this is a beauty contest and all they need is to just look a little bit better than the competition.

With regards to the exposition we gave in our last letter, we received questions from readers asking if we assumed that the EFSF would purchase government debt at par or at market prices. We think at neither. By definition, if market prices were “clearing prices” that excess supply of debt would not be sitting on the asset side of the banks’ balance sheets. For consistency, if the ECB currently applies haircuts to the debt, the EFSF will also not pay par. The uncertainty around pricing, as well as quantity and source is what is delaying, in our view, this transaction.

Now, in our last letter too, we concluded that if the Euro strengthened, it would only be natural to see gold weaken. Since yesterday, after the announcement that the ISM’s factory index last month rose to 60.8 (the fastest pace in more than six years), the negative correlation between the Euro and gold broke, as the chart below shows (source: Bloomberg; price of gold in $/oz on white line), and both rallied. This was a very bullish signal and we took due note. Does this mean that the competition between the two candidates for the world’s reserve currency will disappear? We don’t think so. This is just a truce. Problems are being postponed. In the meantime, carpe diem! Enjoy the ride. (Lastly, we have not dealt with the situation in the Middle East, but we will write our thoughts on it later. So far, we faded the rally in oil and instead traded the view that on the margin, capital will leave the energy sector in the Middle East for a safer place in Canada. To date, the market is telling us we were right on this one… )

feb-2-2008-gold-vs-eur

Martin Sibileau.

Twitt

No Comments »

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang