• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • I moved to “Popular Macro”
  • What is economic growth? (and why we won’t have any)
  • The Microeconomics of Inflation (or how I know this ends in tears)
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone

ARTICLES CALENDAR
February 2011
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog
« Mid-week comments
Adapting to Passive Money »

Green light until March?

Published on February 7th 2011

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: february-7-2011 We start this week with what we ended the last one. In our view, the two main concerns or sources of volatility that remain from last week are the situation in Egypt and the uncertainty over the future scope of the EU’s European Financial [...]

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: february-7-2011

We start this week with what we ended the last one. In our view, the two main concerns or sources of volatility that remain from last week are the situation in Egypt and the uncertainty over the future scope of the EU’s European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF). The picture out of the US or the UK is decidedly one of inflation, monetary expansion with all the known consequences. Out of  China, we expect no news on rates or credit manipulation (i.e. reserve requirement ratios) until March (the PBoC recently conducted Rmb300 bn of reverse repos).

With regards to the political situation out of Egypt, we know as much as anyone else: Nothing! But here’s what we think, and which we understand may not be shared by many: A shift towards democracy in Egypt and the rest of the Middle East is bearish for oil. Regardless of who inherits power in the area, the new political class will need revenue to appease public employees and the people in general. Without the ability to coerce, the new leaders will need to buy peace and will not care a whit about the origin of their much needed funding. This means that the OPEC will slowly become irrelevant, as member countries need to place their produce with urgency, at any price. Along this same rationale, we should not worry about the Suez Canal. Every ruling party in Egypt needs it open to profit from the toll.
So far, we are at the very early stages of a more general transition in the Middle East. On this basis, we preferred not to trade last week’s increase in the price of oil. Instead, we chose to be net long of Canadian energy stocks, with the belief that capital within the energy sector will leave the Middle East, looking for safer jurisdictions.

We now want to turn the readers’ collective attention back to the European Union. If you’ve been following us, you will know by now that we have been bullish of the Euro. During the past week, uncertainty grew around the final shape that the EU will give to the EFSF. On Wednesday, Bloomberg reported that “Germans” were ruling out bond buybacks. This was a scenario that we had analyzed in detail in past letters and it was a scenario that made a lot of sense to us. Upon seeing this title, which unfortunately moved markets, we thoroughly read the article and found that the title had been horribly misleading. In the end, the EU leaders met on Friday only to postpone any fundamental decision around the EFSF, until March.

However, we understand that some speculate that the EFSF could buy sovereign debt currently being held by the European Central Bank (ECB). We really ignore what the final decision will be but warn readers that such a scenario (EFSF sourcing sov debt from the ECB) is different from the one we analyzed two letters ago. In fact, the outcome would be radically opposite to what we expect, if the EFSF bought sovereign debt from EU banks. Here’s why, in summary:

To buy sovereign debt, the EFSF must raise funds, Euros, in the market. This takes liquidity from the financial system. If the liquidity is then used to buy assets (i.e. sov bonds) from the ECB, these Euros will be taken out of circulation (i.e. assets and liabilities of the ECB will decrease). Therefore, not only will the EU witness a crowding out of private in favor of public credit. On top of it, the amounts of Euros in circulation will drop, raising rates.  This would not occur if the EFSF bought the sov bonds from the EU banks (see our letter of Jan 28th). Under both scenarios, the Euro strengthens. However, if liquidity drops because the ECB sells its bonds, the exercise is recessive, affecting the profitability of banks and the competitiveness of those countries the EFSF was set up to help. Should this occur, we think the possibilities of a successful monetary union in the EU would be seriously challenged, and we would use the initial strength in the Euro to quietly shift to a very liquid USD denominated portfolio. Remember that EU sovereign credit default swaps are denominated in USDs…

Martin Sibileau

Twitt

« Mid-week comments
Adapting to Passive Money »

Leave a comment





× 1 = one

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang