• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • The Microeconomics of Inflation (or how I know this ends in tears)
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”

ARTICLES CALENDAR
March 2011
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog
« The EU misses another opportunity
It’s getting complicated »

No domino effect

Published on March 23rd 2011

The main assumption then is that as the EU funds, via the European Financial Stability Facility or via purchases or liquidity injections by the European Central Bank, are applied to simultaneously avoid a default and allow the Euro to strengthen, the problems will not spill over to Spain or Italy.

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: march-23-2011

Since we last wrote a week ago, nothing of fundamental weight has changed (being this the main reason for our absence).
It’s true, unlike last week, the markets now see the nuclear disaster in Japan contained and, perhaps too, something close to a “managed” transition in the Middle East. Even if it takes a coalition to apply force and even if it is not clear what the main goal is and which country actually leads that coalition. It doesn’t matter. Stocks kept rallying until Monday and credit spreads continued tightening.

However, there is a key assumption behind all this behaviour. As Portuguese and Irish sovereign risk widens, the main assumption that prices seem to be signaling is that there will be no domino effect, should any these countries, and Greece, have to restructure their liabilities. To be honest, these countries are already undertaking a restructuring, although with those liabilities related to the bailout effected by the European Union. Interest rate decreases, term extensions and liquidity lines are all undeniably telling a story of restructuring.

The main assumption then is that as the EU funds, via the European Financial Stability Facility or via purchases or liquidity injections by the European Central Bank, are applied to simultaneously avoid a default and allow the Euro to strengthen, the problems will not spill over to Spain or Italy. If that is the case, we can justify the rally in stocks, the tighter credit spreads, the price of gold and WTI oil above $1,400/oz and $100/bl, respectively.

We will not write about the politics taking place in the background, as the EU negotiations are carried out. Ireland is still fighting to keep whatever trace of sovereignty has left and the symbolic 12.5% corporate tax rate that Brussels wants dead seems to be the last line. Portugal is playing games with the EU and Greece does what it can to show that somewhere down the road, default is avoidable.

The message we want to leave today is this: In order to (a) avoid a domino effect in the EU involving Spain and Italy and (b) remain with a single currency called Euro… whatever final form a debt restructuring is pushed to take, the EU will have to avert by all means a run against any country’s banking system.

The first thing that is crucial here is to send a clear message that there will be a lender of last resort, if there is a run against deposits in a country’s financial system. This goes against Trichet’s notion that it is possible to establish what he called a “separation principle”. The ECB cannot sustainably switch (it has not done so yet, but it has sent the message it will) from fixed rate to variable rate auctions and at the same time raise interest rates, within this fiscal context. In the long term, it cannot even sterilize either (When the ECB offers liquidity at a fixed rate, Banks can take all the liquidity they need, at a fixed price. Effectively, the ECB loses control of its balance sheet. When the ECB offers liquidity at a variable rate, Banks can only bid for the amount offered by the ECB, and the rates are the product of the auction process).

So far, a retreat of 30-50bps in stocks yesterday may be telling us that the market is giving the EU and ECB the benefit of the doubt. If you are a gold bug, you want the ECB to push this inconsistency further, for it would bring the collapse of the monetary union, making room for gold to take over. If the ECB backs off and postpones the “separation”, showing it is there for the banks, then the road up for gold will be a rough one and marked by the next fiscal crisis: That of the US.

Martin Sibileau

Twitt

« The EU misses another opportunity
It’s getting complicated »

Leave a comment





9 − = five

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang