• HOME
  • About the contributor
  • Articles (RSS)
Subscribe to Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
  • Another attempt in the history of failed manipulations
  • A short history of currency swaps
  • Why the Fed’s buy & hold (no sales) exit is not feasible
  • From Shirakawa to Kuroda: The regime change explained
  • Modern Monetary Theory is the winner…at least for now
  • The template that nobody is watching
  • Why Mr. Dijsselbloem is right and Cyprus is a template for the Euro zone
  • Why Cyprus 2013 is worse than the KreditAnstalt (1931) and Argentina 2001 crises
  • Gold manipulation, Part 3: “The systemic risk of gold manipulation”
  • Gold manipulation, Part 2: How they do it (and a suggestion to hedge it)

ARTICLES CALENDAR
May 2011
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

ARTICLES CATEGORIES
  • Letter Articles

ARCHIVES
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009


Search this Blog
« It starts with deleveraging, it ends with hyperinflation
Déjà Vu »

The separation principle and the US dollar

Published on May 16th 2011

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: may-16-2011 A week later, the sell off in commodities has continued, due to the global deleveraging that is taking place. It has been so serious that the media everywhere is almost calling the commodity rally dead. All sorts of explanations, most of superstitious nature, are [...]

Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: may-16-2011

A week later, the sell off in commodities has continued, due to the global deleveraging that is taking place. It has been so serious that the media everywhere is almost calling the commodity rally dead. All sorts of explanations, most of superstitious nature, are given. We have even  read an analyst suggest that in general, all rallies last about 115 to 130 months…therefore, the rally in gold is finished!

Last week we noted that: “…In this context, it may no longer be wise to trade long risk (i.e. commodities, stocks), but on a hedged basis (i.e. short Euro), to address the many deleveraging bouts that we will experience…” Below, we show the long gold/short euro trade, expressed in US dollars, via two ETFs (DGP: 2x long gold and EUO: 2x short Euro), which yielded a 1.83% return for the week (= [3.35% + 0.31%] / 2) , way better (more profitable and less volatile) than to be long gold in US dollars.

may-16-2011

Should this performance of commodities, in currencies other than the US dollar, signal that the rally is not dead? Does it indeed have legs? Whenever we ask this ourselves, we answer with another question: “What makes you think interest rates will rise?”

On this point, we like Peter Schiff’s view (watch: http://youtu.be/4bZglexQk4o ). Peter says that the Fed will not raise rates because it will make it very expensive for the US Treasury to service its debt. He also thinks that QE2 was not to “support” growth, but to finance the US Treasury. Although this makes sense to us, we fear that it may not necessarily hold true.

We think the Fed could find ways to raise the policy rate, without impacting the US Treasury debt servicing capability. At least in the short term, and we at least, live in the short term. This perspective is consistent with what the European Central Bank has done, under the so called “separation principle”. The ECB has raised rates and at the same time, it has considerably deteriorated the quality of its assets, extending liquidity lines to weak financial institutions and indirectly, to peripheral governments. This has of course weighted on the Euro, but it has so far worked. Can it work forever? No, it cannot. But it serves as an example.

On this line, we learned from a note by the Bank of America, that proposed margining rules under the derivatives reform provisions of the Dodd-Frank act may be passed requiring financial institutions in the US to raise collateral on their derivatives positions in the form of US Treasuries (refer: “Dodd-Frank Collateral Rules Implements QE3”, Credit Derivatives Strategist, May 11th, 2011) . If passed, Bank of America estimates this could coerce the purchase of sums comparable to those of QE2, effectively establishing another wave of government debt monetization. The important thing here is that this could take place in 2012 simultaneously with an increase in interest rates, without impairing the US Treasury. The overall effect would be a formidable crowding out of the private sector from the debt market. Gold bugs be warned!

Martin Sibileau

Twitt

  • Tags
  • collateral Rules,Dodd-Frank,separation principle
« It starts with deleveraging, it ends with hyperinflation
Déjà Vu »

4 Comments for “The separation principle and the US dollar”

  1. stop spam plugin dice:
    February 12th, 2012 at 2:08 AM

    Websites worth visiting…

    [...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……

  2. ICM Document Solutions dice:
    February 15th, 2012 at 7:25 PM

    Websites worth visiting…

    [...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]…

  3. livechat dice:
    February 15th, 2012 at 9:22 PM

    Gems form the internet…

    [...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……

  4. Webcam Sex dice:
    February 15th, 2012 at 10:32 PM

    Websites we think you should visit…

    [...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]……

Leave a comment





nine − 7 =

  • The comments expressed in this website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its affiliates.
  • All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily reflect mine.
  • The information contained herein is not necessarily complete and its accuracy is not guaranteed. If you are receiving this communication in error, please notify me immediately by electronic mail (martin@sibileau.com) or telephone at 647-999-2055.
  • My comments provide general information only. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and contracts for differences).
  • My comments are not intended to provide personal investment advice and they do not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person.
All rights reserved. A view from the Trenches is proudly powered by WordPress. Wordpress theme designed and coded by SibileauLang